Mentor FAQs and Resources

The PROPEL program was developed to make research, teaching, and work-study opportunities transparent and equitable. Read more about the PROPEL mission, history, and the team in About Us.

PROPEL works in rounds timed in accordance with the semesters, ADD/DROP deadlines and registration. There are distinct phases to each round: project posting, student application and application review

1. Mentors post projects to the website.
2. After the project posting date closes, students can apply for positions.
3. After the student application period closes, mentors can review the applications, interview students, and offer the position. Mentors should either accept or decline all students by the end of the review phase.
4. After the application review phase closes, an email is sent notifying students they have been accepted or declined for the position (you should have already notified students who have been accepted).

For future PROPEL rounds see - https://propel.umass.edu/rounds 

The application limit is designed to encourage students to really think about the projects they're interested in, rather than just applying to all of them. To help with strategizing, PROPEL provides a cool feature with which students can see how many students have applied to a project and how many spots are available in that project. That way, students can both apply for “dream” projects that may be particularly competitive as well as projects with fewer applicants and better odds.

New mentors and previous mentors who have a track record of fully reviewing and making decisions on their applicants have a gold star next their name on the public project listings page.  This is a great indicator for students when they are applying for projects.  A gold star means that the mentor fully reviewed all of their applicants the last time they posted a project.

Log into PROPEL and request Mentor status. Once you have Mentor status click on Mentor Tasks > My Projects and create a project. This project will be saved for future rounds. You can only create and activate projects during the project posting period within a round.

These suggestions are from an article led by UMass graduate students Nigel Golden and Kadambari Devarajan Ten simple rules for productive lab meetings

1. Define lab mission and objectives
2. Identify roles and rules
3. Be accessible and inclusive
4. Be supportive
5. Be respectful and practice civility
6. Manage conflict
7. Be open and curious
8. Be mindful and present
9. Be aware of biases
10. Be flexible and adaptable

Students can apply to up to 5 projects, but many students are as interested in obtain experience as they are in a particular project. Students have the option to opt into making their profile available to all mentors. If you wish to view the profiles of other students who did not apply go to Mentor task > Student info.

Contact the PROPEL team to make suggestion for category options that match your field of research using the Contact form at the bottom of the page once you are logged in to the site. 

After you post your project, you can make changes to it up until the “Last day to post projects” deadline. After that, students can start applying to your project up until the “Last day to apply for projects” deadline. There is nothing to do for mentors during this time.

Here is the link to Mutual Mentoring project. This project is support through a grant from the UMass Office of Faculty Development for 2024-2025 "A Bottom-Up Network for Developing Transparent Policies and Mechanisms for Equitable Access to STEM Undergraduate Research Experiences" to bring together faculty from departments in the Colleges of Natural Sciences and Engineering to learn faculty experiences and traditions in different disciplines and from scholars nationwide. We will use these practices in our roles as mentors, teachers and more broadly in our communities to effectively mentor diverse undergraduate researchers.  

These suggestions are from a blog post by UMass graduate student Emma Dauster in That's Life[Science]

1. Make time
2. Give them assignments in which you have an interest
3. Establish expectations clearly, early, and frequently
4. Review performance and revisit expectations regularly
5. Be open to their interests
6. Build a community in your team
7. Value the perspective of each team member equally
8. Provide multiple avenues of grievance mitigation
9. Give them training
10. Understand that their lived experiences are likely very different from yours

"...Research has demonstrated that undergraduates who participate in research projects and positively interact with faculty are more likely to pursue and attain post-baccalaureate degrees as well as subsequent careers as faculty or research scientists." This article discusses some of the challenges faced by underrepresented students Evidence-Based Strategies for Improving Diversity and Inclusion in Undergraduate Research Labs and ways to improve student recruitment and experiences

Many labs now have a lab expectation and values document to share with students or have them sign. A popular starting point is Mariam Aly's The key to a happy lab life is in the manual. Here is her Current version on Github.  Oregon State University provides a nice guide to creating mentoring contracts with examples from 5 different universities.